Compare LLM Providers

Compare LLM APIs for OpenCode, Hermes, OpenClaw and custom agent stacks. Check pricing, quotas, compatibility and copy-ready configs before burning credits.

Loading live provider catalog

Real bill behind this comparison?

Turn the provider choice into a 48h cost/routing audit.

For production stacks, the cheapest provider is rarely the whole answer. Send the workload and we will map cheaper routes, fallback logic and config-shaped next steps.

Claude/Codex limits route map

Comparing providers because limits feel random?

Split context, routine edits, tool output, failed retries and final review before switching plans or moving the whole stack.

Start with the 4-line brief

No keys, no repo access. A rough paragraph is fine; we just need enough context to decide whether the 100 EUR audit has a practical route to test.

1. providers/models:
2. rough monthly spend or token volume:
3. workflow type:
4. one expensive session or failure loop:
Email brief
VS

Local vs hosted vs router

A hybrid stack can use the router for breadth/fallbacks and the direct provider when price, quota or latency wins.

Hybrid decision layer
Together Aihosted API

Best when this provider's native API or unique models fit the workload.

Agent fit: unknownInsufficient data
Openrouterrouter

Best when you need model variety, failover and one integration surface across providers.

Agent fit: unknownInsufficient data

Pricing Model

Together Ai

Provider pricing

Openrouter

Provider pricing

Free Tier

Together Ai

Not listed

Openrouter

Not listed

OpenAI Compatible

Together Ai

No

Openrouter

No

Agent workflow fit

Together Ai

Needs verification

Openrouter

Needs verification

Region

Together Ai

Openrouter

Reliability Score

Together Ai

0%

Openrouter

0%

Affiliate Status

Together Ai

NONE

Openrouter

NONE

Base URL

Together Ai

Openrouter

Catalog depth

Free coverage

Lowest input

Not enough data

Hot deals

Overall fit

Weighted by coverage, price, context, free access and deal heat.

Together Ai12%
Openrouter12%

Cheapest input

Not enough data

Largest context

Provider value map

Live VALUE / CHEAP / CTX score from published provider prices and context windows.

Together Ai

n/a inn/a out ctx n/a
0 models
Value4%
Cheap?
Ctx8

Openrouter

n/a inn/a out ctx n/a
0 models
Value4%
Cheap?
Ctx8

Scenario fit lab

Reweights the live metrics for cost control, scale, agents or balanced routing.

Winner:
Together Ai11%
Openrouter11%

Monthly cost estimator

Assumes 72% input / 28% output tokens.

100M tokens

Together Ai

n/a

at observed min prices

Openrouter

n/a

at observed min prices

Estimated cost per successful task

builder decision task · retry adjusted

Together Ai

n/a

Openrouter

n/a

Estimate only: 18 000 input tokens, 3 000 output tokens, retry multiplier 1.05x-1.25x.

Model coverage gap

0

Edge:

Free-route gap

0

Edge:

Context ceiling gap

0 ctx

Edge:

Cost spread

n/a

Edge: Tie

Decision report

A copy-ready summary generated from the current comparison, scenario and monthly token volume.

Verdict

In the current balanced scenario, — has the stronger live fit. Cost estimates, context ceiling and provider-model coverage are recalculated when you move the token slider or change providers.

Cost edge

Not enough data

Scale edge

Overall fit: — (Together Ai 12% / Openrouter 12%).

Scenario (balanced): — (Together Ai 11% / Openrouter 11%).

Lowest input: Not enough data (Together Ai n/a / Openrouter n/a).

Monthly estimate for 100M tokens: Together Ai n/a / Openrouter n/a.

Estimated cost per successful builder decision task: Together Ai n/a / Openrouter n/a.

Catalog depth: Together Ai 0 models / Openrouter 0 models.

Max context: Together Ai ctx n/a / Openrouter ctx n/a.

Free options: Together Ai 0 / Openrouter 0.

Decision radar

Compact live scorecard for cost, coverage, context and deal momentum.

Animated charts
11fit

Together Ai

11fit

Openrouter

Depth0 / 0
Together Ai12%
Openrouter12%
Free options0 / 0
Together Ai12%
Openrouter12%
Input pricen/a / n/a
Together Ai8%
Openrouter8%
Max contextctx n/a / ctx n/a
Together Ai8%
Openrouter8%
Reasoning models0 / 0
Together Ai12%
Openrouter12%
Deal heat0 hot / 0 hot
Together Ai12%
Openrouter12%

Live comparison matrix

Animated bars are computed from the current DealsForge API response.

Catalog depth

Provider-model rows indexed by DealsForge.

Winner: Tie
Together Ai0
Openrouter0

Free options

Models with verified free access or free deal coverage.

Winner: Tie
Together Ai0
Openrouter0

Lowest input price

Cheapest published input token price in the catalog.

Winner: Tie
Together Ain/a
Openroutern/a

Max context

Largest context window observed in provider-model data.

Winner: Tie
Together Aictx n/a
Openrouterctx n/a

Reasoning models

Reasoning-capable models detected in the inventory.

Winner: Tie
Together Ai0
Openrouter0

Deal heat

Highest active hot score found for this provider.

Winner: Tie
Together Ai0 hot
Openrouter0 hot

Together Ai

· Native API

Agent fit: unknownInsufficient data

Models

0

Free

0

Deals

0

Strong models

No model inventory yet.

Openrouter

· Native API

Agent fit: unknownInsufficient data

Models

0

Free

0

Deals

0

Strong models

No model inventory yet.

Choosing between providers?

Get the provider decision reviewed before switching.

If this comparison touches a real bill, send your providers, models and workload. We will map a practical route and only push payment when there is something useful to test.

Quick Comparisons